Two days in a row, at the lunch food bowl, teachers have had the following argument completely in Mandinka. If this conversation was to hold place in a courtroom, here’s how it’d go.
Prosecution: We accuse aforementioned fat teacher of being pregnant.
Defendant: We stand by the defendant’s word that she is not pregnant.
Prosecution: We wish to enter the following two pieces of information into consideration
1. The defendant is fat.
2. She doesn’t feel good today.
I’m no doctor, but to me, that means pregnancy.
Defendant: I can explain all of that. Please enter these two nuggets of info as exhibits A and B.
A. My client is not pregnant
B. She’s just fat
And, ladies and gentleman of the jury, to further prove it, my client will lift her shirt, showing her high waisted skirt and full view of her undergarments, and wiggle her fat around to prove there is no baby there. Fat teacher, if you would.
Prosecution: Objection, your honor! If we are not allowed to poke and prod at that fat, how can we know it’s real.
Judge: Sustained. You may poke and prod.
Prosecution: (after many minutes of jiggling, squeezing, shaking, and poking) No further questions your honor.
wandered here from PC journals. this is hilarious!
ReplyDelete